The AI Regulation in the version used here corresponds to the version that was finally adopted by the European bodies. It differs from the official version published in the Official Journal in almost ...The AI Regulation in the version used here corresponds to the version that was finally adopted by the European bodies. It differs from the official version published in the Official Journal in almost 90 places. These are places where the content of the committee version was subsequently amended. The changes are hidden in a large number of grammatical changes and rewording that are purely editorial in nature. The extent to which these subsequent changes to the content are lawful and therefore effective must be decided elsewhere. This AI only takes into account the text of the regulation. Further regulations or harmonized standards that have been issued in the meantime are not (yet) taken into account here.
The content of this chatbot is based on both the AI Act and the publication “Critical Analysis of the EU Regulation on Artificial Intelligence” ([german ISBN: 9798339929994). Due to the fact that the ...The content of this chatbot is based on both the AI Act and the publication “Critical Analysis of the EU Regulation on Artificial Intelligence” ([german ISBN: 9798339929994). Due to the fact that the AI Act is not technically rigorous and does not have a strict systematic structure due to its content, which is partly attributable to the many duplications, this makes it difficult for AI to comprehend. Nevertheless, this law, including the analytical explanations, attempts to make it manageable with the help of AI. This should enable developers of AI systems, for example, to develop their AI in compliance with the law. This AI serves this purpose. However, this is initially a pure test operation that offers no guarantee and cannot replace actual legal advice.